The Books Left Out of Your Bible_ and the Real Reason They Were Left Out (No Ads)

Welcome back to the Bible Stories. You may notice there

are no ads on this video because YouTube has demonetized

our channel. To support us, you can scan the first

QR code to join the Bible Stories podcast app, where

you can listen offline and access exclusive episodes. Or, if

you simply want to give, you can scan the second

QR code to donate directly. Thank you for helping us

keep these Bible Stories going. For centuries, people have asked

the same question. If ancient writings existed that talked about God, angels, prophets, Jesus,

and the earliest followers of Christianity, then why are they

not in the Bible? Why do we have these books,

but not those books? Were some writings removed because they

contained dangerous truths? Were certain voices silenced because powerful people

did not want ordinary believers to read them? Or is

the real story completely different from what many people imagine?

Because when you look closer at the history of these

forgotten writings, something surprising appears. The story is not simply

about books that were hidden. It is about books that

were examined, books that were copied, books that were read

by ancient believers, books that sometimes influenced Christian thought— And yet,

after centuries of discussion, some writings remained outside the collection

that Christians came to recognize as Scripture. The reason is

not as simple as many people think. A book being

old does not automatically make it Scripture. A book mentioning

Jesus does not automatically make it Scripture. Even a book

containing true statements does not automatically mean it belongs in

the Bible. And this is where the real question begins, not,

why were these books removed? But, how did the early

believers recognize which writings carried the authority of God's Word?

because the Bible itself did not appear in history as

a finished book dropped from heaven. It came through a

process God worked through prophets, apostles, communities of faith, and

generations of believers who preserved the writings they believed carried

divine authority. And when you understand that process, the mystery

of the so-called lost books of the Bible begins to

look very different. Some of these writings are fascinating. Some

contain ancient traditions. Some reveal what certain groups believed about

Jesus and the early church. Some even preserve ideas that

help historians understand the world in which Christianity developed. But

being historically valuable and being scripture are not the same thing.

That difference is the key to understanding why these books

were left outside the Bible. One of the biggest misunderstandings

about the Bible is the idea that it was created

through one single decision. Many people imagine a group of

religious leaders gathering in a room, placing hundreds of books

on a table, and simply deciding, this one stays, this

one goes. But history was much more complicated. The Bible

is not one book written by one person at one time.

It is a collection of writings created across many centuries.

The Old Testament was formed through the history of Israel.

Its books came from prophets, leaders, poets, and historians who

recorded God's dealings with his people. Moses wrote the law.

The prophets delivered God's messages. The psalmists recorded prayers, worship,

and struggles. The historical books preserved the story of God's

covenant with Israel. These writings were not accepted simply because

someone liked them. They were recognized because they were connected

to God's revelation and preserved among God's people. The New

Testament developed in a different way. The center of the

New Testament is not a nation. It is a person,

Jesus Christ. The four Gospels tell the story of his life,

his teachings, his death, and his resurrection. The letters explain

the meaning of his work and how his followers should live.

The Book of Acts records the spread of the early church.

But when Christianity began spreading throughout the Roman Empire, many

other writings also appeared. Some people wrote stories about Jesus' childhood.

Some wrote additional teachings they claimed came from Jesus. Some

wrote visions about heaven and hell. Some wrote letters claiming

to come from apostles. And this created an important question

for the early church. which writings truly came from the

apostles and carried God's authority, and which writings were valuable, interesting,

or meaningful, but belonged to another category. This was not

a question that appeared centuries later. The earliest Christians were

already asking it. The Apostle Paul himself warned believers that

not every message claiming spiritual authority should automatically be accepted.

John warned believers to test the spirits because false teachers

had already appeared. The early church understood something important. A

religious writing and a scripture writing were not always the

same thing. This distinction changes everything. When people hear the phrase,

lost books of the Bible, they often imagine books that

were once part of scripture and were later deleted. But

that is usually not what happened. Many of these writings

were never considered part of the biblical canon by the

majority of believers. They were not removed from a completed Bible.

They were outside the Bible because they never met the

same standard as the writings that were received as Scripture.

Think about it this way. A historian may discover an

ancient letter written by a Roman emperor. That letter may

be authentic. It may tell us fascinating things about history.

It may even contain wisdom. But does that mean it

belongs inside the constitution of a country? No, because importance

and authority are different categories. In the same way, an

ancient Christian writing can be meaningful without having the same

authority as Scripture. This is exactly why some early Christian

writings remained important even though they were not included in

the Bible. For example, some writings from early church leaders

give us valuable information about Christian worship, persecution, and beliefs.

They help us understand the world of the first Christians.

But the early church did not place them on the

same level as the writings connected to the apostles. The

question was never, is this book interesting? Many of them were.

The question was, does this book carry the authority of

God's revealed word? That was a much deeper question. One

reason people become interested in these writings is because the

Bible itself sometimes mentions other books. For example, the Old

Testament refers to writings such as the book of Jasher.

Joshua says, Is this not written in the book of Jasher?

2 Samuel also mentions it. And this creates an obvious question.

If the Bible mentions another book, why is that book

not in the Bible? The answer is simpler than many

people expect. A biblical writer mentioning another source does not

automatically mean that the source belongs in Scripture. The Bible

contains references to many things outside of Scripture. Paul quoted

Greek poets when speaking to the Athenians. Jude referenced material

connected to the book of Enoch. The fact that a

biblical author uses information from another source does not mean

the entire source becomes inspired scripture. Sometimes a writer may

reference another document because it contains accurate information. Sometimes they

may use an illustration that their audience already understands. Sometimes

they may quote a statement to make a specific point.

But inspiration belongs to the biblical text itself. Not every

source mentioned by a biblical author shares that same authority.

This is one of the first keys to understanding the

missing books. The question is not only, was this book known?

The question is, was this book given the same authority

as Scripture? And that distinction becomes even more important when

we look at some of the most famous examples, because

among all the ancient writings outside the Bible, few have

created more curiosity than one mysterious book connected to one

of the most unusual figures in Genesis, the book of Enoch.

Among all the ancient writings outside the Bible, few have

captured the imagination of people more than the book of Enoch.

and it is easy to understand why. The name itself

comes from one of the most mysterious figures in Genesis, Enoch.

The Bible gives us only a few sentences about him,

but those sentences are enough to make people wonder. Genesis says,

Enoch walked faithfully with God, then he was no more,

because God took him away. Genesis chapter 5 verse 24.

Genesis 5:24

Most people in Genesis are described by the same pattern.

They lived They had children. They died. But Enoch is different.

He disappears. The Bible does not say that he died.

It says that God took him. And that single detail

created centuries of curiosity. What happened to Enoch? What did

he see? What secrets did God reveal to him? The

book of Enoch claims to answer those questions. It describes

visions of heaven. It describes angels called the Watchers. It

describes the judgment of rebellious spiritual beings. It describes the

final victory of God's kingdom. And because of its mysterious content,

many people have asked the same question. If this book

talks about such important things, and if even the New

Testament mentions it, why is it not in the Bible?

Was it removed? Was something hidden? Or is there another explanation?

To understand that, we have to separate two things that

are often confused. A book can contain truth. A book

can influence believers. A book can even be quoted by Scripture.

But that does not automatically mean the entire book is Scripture,

and the story of Enoch shows exactly why. The book

of Enoch was not written during the lifetime of the

biblical Enoch. This is one of the most important facts

to understand. The biblical Enoch lived before Noah, before the flood,

thousands of years before the birth of Christ. But the

Book of Enoch that exists today was written much later.

Most scholars date its different sections somewhere between the third

and first centuries before Christ. This means the book belongs

to a later period of Jewish history. It was not

unusual during this time for Jewish writers to write using

the names of famous biblical figures. They wrote about Moses,

they wrote about Abraham, they wrote about Adam, they wrote

about Enoch. Why? Because these figures represented important moments in

God's story. A writer using the name of an ancient

figure was often trying to communicate This message connects with

the wisdom and authority of the past. This practice was

common in the ancient world, but it also means that

the title of a book does not automatically prove who

wrote it. And this becomes one of the reasons the

Book of Enoch was not accepted as scripture by most

Jewish and Christian communities. The question was not whether the

book was interesting. It certainly was. The question was whether

it truly came from the prophet it claimed to represent.

One reason the book of Enoch became so famous is

because it expands on one of the strangest passages in Genesis.

Genesis chapter 6 says, The sons of God saw that

Genesis 6 · chapter mention

the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any

of them they chose. Then it mentions the Nephilim. A

mysterious group that has fascinated readers for thousands of years.

Who were the sons of God? Who were the Nephilim?

What exactly happened before the flood? The book of Enoch

offers a very detailed explanation. It describes a group of

angels called the Watchers. According to Enoch, these heavenly beings

rebelled against God, descended to earth, and corrupted humanity. They

taught humans forbidden knowledge. They taught warfare. They taught magical practices.

They revealed things that humanity was not meant to possess.

Their actions brought judgment from God. The Watchers were condemned.

Their offspring, the giants, brought violence and destruction. and Enoch

becomes the person who receives a vision of God's judgment

against them. The book describes Enoch traveling through heavenly realms.

He sees God's throne. He sees angels. He sees places

of punishment. He sees the future judgment when evil will

finally be defeated. It is a dramatic and powerful vision,

and this explains why many ancient Jews and Christians found

it fascinating. The book of Enoch attempted to answer questions

that Genesis left open. It filled in the spaces. It

gave details where Scripture was silent. But this also creates

an important question. Should every ancient explanation of biblical mysteries

become part of the Bible? And the early believers answered

that question carefully, because curiosity is not the same thing

as revelation. One of the strongest arguments people make for

the book of Enoch is this. the New Testament quotes it,

and that is true. The book of Jude contains a

reference connected to Enoch. Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied

about them, See, the Lord is coming with thousands upon

thousands of his holy ones. Jude 1.14 So if Jude

used Enoch, does that mean the book of Enoch belongs

in the Bible? This is where we need to think carefully.

A biblical writer quoting another source does not automatically give

that entire source the status of Scripture. The Apostle Paul

did something similar. When Paul preached in Athens, he quoted

Greek poets. He used words from writers outside the Bible

to communicate truth to his audience. But nobody argues that

those Greek poems should be added to Scripture. The reason

is simple. A quotation can be true without the entire

source being inspired. A person can quote a sentence from

a book without accepting every sentence in that book. The

same principle applies to Jude. Jude may have recognized that

a particular statement connected with Enoch was accurate, but that

does not necessarily mean Jude was declaring the entire collection

known as the Book of Enoch to be Scripture. The

difference is small, but it matters. One of the most

interesting things about the book of Enoch is that it

was not treated like an enemy book. This is important.

Many people imagine a hidden battle where church leaders discovered

Enoch and immediately tried to destroy it. But history does

not support that picture. The Book of Enoch was known.

It was copied. It was discussed. Some early Christians respected it.

Some writers were influenced by its ideas. But respect is

not the same as canon. The early church had many

writings that were considered valuable. The Shepherd of Hermas was

widely read. The writings of early Christian leaders were highly respected.

But they were not placed alongside Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter,

and the other apostolic writings. Why? Because the early believers

recognized a difference between writings that help us understand faith

and writings that carry the authority of God's revealed Word.

The book of Enoch remained important, but it remained outside

the biblical canon, not because someone erased it, but because

it was never recognized by the majority of God's people

as scripture. If the book of Enoch is famous because

of its visions of heaven, the gospel of Thomas is

famous because of its claim to preserve hidden words of Jesus.

And this creates another fascinating question. What if there were

teachings of Jesus that his closest followers recorded but the

Bible left out? That is exactly why many people are

fascinated by Thomas. The Gospel of Thomas is not like Matthew, Mark, Luke,

or John. It does not tell the story of Jesus' birth.

It does not describe his miracles. It does not tell

the story of the crucifixion. It does not describe the resurrection. Instead,

it contains a collection of sayings. The book begins by

presenting itself as a collection of secret teachings supposedly spoken

by Jesus and recorded by Thomas. It contains sayings that

sound familiar. Some resemble teachings found in the four Gospels,

but others are very different. Some are mysterious. Some are symbolic.

Some reflect ideas that became associated with Gnostic movements. And

this is where the real issue appears. The question was not,

does this book mention Jesus? Many writings did. The question was,

does this book present the same Jesus that the apostolic

writings present? The four biblical gospels present a consistent message.

Jesus came as the Son of God. He taught about

the kingdom of God. He died for sin. He rose

from the dead. Salvation comes through faith in Him. The

Gospel of Thomas presents a very different emphasis. Its focus

is often on discovering hidden knowledge, understanding secret truths, finding

spiritual reality within oneself. This reflects ideas associated with Gnosticism.

Gnosticism was not one single movement, but many groups that

shared certain beliefs. One common theme was that spiritual knowledge

was the key to salvation. The problem with this teaching

was that it changed the center of Christianity. The biblical

message says human beings need God to save them. The

Gospel of Thomas moves toward the idea that people need

to discover hidden spiritual knowledge within themselves. The difference is enormous.

One places salvation in the work of Christ. The other

places emphasis on enlightenment and secret understanding. This is why

many early Christians did not accept Thomas as scripture. Not

because it was unknown, not because it was hidden, but

because its message did not match the apostolic teaching that

had been passed down from the earliest believers. This leads

to one of the biggest misunderstandings about so-called lost books.

Many people say the Gospel of Thomas was removed from

the Bible. But historically, that is not accurate. The Gospel

of Thomas was not removed. It was never part of

the widely recognized New Testament canon. The four Gospels were

already being used by early Christian communities. Matthew, Mark, Luke, John.

These writings had something Thomas did not have, a direct

connection to the apostles and the earliest witnesses of Jesus' life.

The early church did not simply ask, Is this about Jesus?

They asked, Does this come from the witnesses chosen by Jesus?

That standard protected the church from accepting every later writing

that claimed authority. Because after Jesus' resurrection, many people began

creating alternative accounts. Some were written because people sincerely wanted

to preserve traditions. Some were written because groups wanted to

support their own beliefs. Some used the names of apostles

to make their writings appear more authoritative. The challenge was

not finding books about Jesus. The challenge was recognizing which

books truly carried his authority. the Book of Enoch, the

Gospel of Thomas, and many other famous lost books. They

are fascinating. They reveal the questions ancient believers asked. They

show the debates that existed in the early centuries of Christianity.

They help historians understand the world surrounding the Bible. But

the reason they were left outside Scripture was not because

they were too powerful. It was not because they contained

a secret truth that destroyed Christianity. The deeper reason was

much more simple. They were not recognized as carrying the

same authority as the writings that became the Bible. And

to understand that process even better, we have to look

at the most controversial examples of all, books that did

not simply add extra details about Jesus, books that completely

reimagined who Jesus was, including the Gospel of Judas. Among

all the writings outside the Bible, few have created more

controversy than the Gospel of Judas. And the reason is simple.

Everyone knows Judas Iscariot. His name has become almost a

symbol of betrayal itself. He was the disciple who walked

with Jesus. He heard his teachings. He witnessed his miracles.

He sat at the same table as the Savior. And yet,

according to the four Gospels, Judas handed Jesus over to

his enemies. For centuries, Christians have understood Judas as the

disciple who chose money over loyalty, the man who exchanged

his master for thirty pieces of silver, the man whose

betrayal led Jesus toward the cross. But the Gospel of

Judas tells a completely different story. It asks, what if

Judas was not the villain? What if Judas was actually

the only disciple who understood Jesus' true mission? What if

the betrayal was not an act of evil, but an

act of obedience? This is the shocking idea at the

center of this ancient text. But before we decide what

the Gospel of Judas means, we have to understand what

kind of writing it actually is. Because the biggest question

is not, does this book tell a different story? It does.

The bigger question is, does this different story come from

the same foundation as the teachings of Jesus and his apostles?

And when we examine that question, we discover why this

gospel was never accepted as scripture. The gospel of Judas

was likely written in the second century, long after the

events of Jesus' earthly ministry. Like many other writings from

this period, it uses the name of an important biblical figure.

But the purpose is not simply to tell history. It

is to communicate a particular theological message. And that message

is very different from the message found in the New Testament.

In the biblical Gospels, Jesus' death is not an accident.

It is not a mistake. It is not something that

happened because Judas successfully defeated God's plan. The cross is

presented as the central purpose of Christ's mission. Jesus himself says,

The cross is not a tragedy that interrupted God's plan.

It is the plan. But the Gospel of Judas presents

a different understanding. It reflects ideas connected to Gnosticism, where

the physical world was often viewed as inferior or even corrupted.

In this worldview, the physical body could be seen as

a prison for the true spiritual self. So salvation was

not primarily about forgiveness of sins through Christ's sacrifice. Instead,

salvation was about escaping the material world through secret knowledge.

This changes everything. The question is no longer, how can

sinful humanity be reconciled with a holy God? The question becomes,

how can the spiritual part of humanity escape the physical world?

Those are two completely different messages. One centers on redemption.

The other centers on hidden enlightenment. And this explains why

Judas is transformed in this gospel. If the body is

a prison, then Jesus' physical death is not a sacrifice.

It is a release. According to this text, Judas becomes

special because he understands what the other disciples do not.

He understands that Jesus needs to be freed from his

physical body. So when Judas hands Jesus over, he is

not betraying him. He is helping him complete his mission.

It is a complete reversal of the biblical story. The

disciple who was remembered as the betrayer becomes the disciple

with secret knowledge. If this video helped you grow deeper

in God's Word, I want to personally invite you to

be part of what we are building here. Every video

on this channel takes many hours of study and careful

research to make sure we bring you content that is

faithful to Scripture and worthy of your time. If you

would like to support this mission and help us keep

making these videos, you can find a link in the

description below to give a one-time gift or become a

monthly supporter. Every gift, no matter the size, goes directly

toward creating more content like this. And if you are

not in a position to give right now, that is

completely fine. the best thing you can do is subscribe,

share this video with someone who needs to hear it,

and keep studying God's Word with us. Thank you for

being here, and may God bless you richly.