Sermon
Genesis 6 and the Problem with the Sethite View - Mailbag
Publisher transcript
Transcript
-
Hello and welcome back to the Christ our cornerstone
-
church podcast. This is another mailbag and I
-
knew after my sermon. this past week, which was
-
called The Voices That Beg. And we got into a
-
little bit about demonology, just a touch. And
-
I shared that. I don't what I believe demons
-
are, what I think is the biblical presence, precedence
-
for demons, and that is that they are the disembodied
-
spirits of Nephilim. And I knew that. It would
-
cause some questions, which is good. And I'm
-
glad. And so I had one of our members reach out
-
and they asked, well, what about the sethite
-
view? Because that's what I thought Genesis six
-
was about. But I'm not sure what to do with Nephilim
-
and all that jazz. So this is a great, great
-
question. And if you're not familiar with the
-
sethite view, that's OK. I'm going to give you
-
what the sethite view is in just a moment. But
-
I will tell you that. I held the Sethite view.
-
There's actually four views of Genesis six and
-
you may be going, what is Genesis six? Well,
-
I will read it. Let me grab a Bible here and
-
turn to Genesis six. It's a passage that typically,
-
specifically we as Americans in church don't.
-
Like to wrestle with, and we don't hear a lot
-
of sermons about it, but when you when you get.
-
into the nitty gritty of it. And you actually
-
get a biblical defense for Genesis six. Then
-
you begin to see how all of scripture makes sense.
-
And here's Genesis six, OK, Genesis six, starting
-
verse one, it says when man began to multiply
-
on the face of the land and daughters were born
-
to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters
-
of man were attractive and they took as their
-
wives any they chose. Then the Lord said to them,
-
My spirit shall not abide in man forever, for
-
he is flesh. His day shall be one hundred and
-
twenty years. The Nephilim. So that's verse four.
-
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days
-
and also afterward when the sons of God came
-
into the daughters of man and they bore children
-
to them. These were the mighty men who were of
-
old, the men of renown. So what do we do with
-
that? So Let me go back. So again, I held to
-
for a very long time the sethite view and there's
-
four actual views. I won't go into the other
-
the other two because they're just not to me.
-
They're they're not even close to being. Correct.
-
And so. I didn't want to take on the Nephilim
-
giant angels cohabitating with humans view because
-
I felt. It tapped too much into my charismatic
-
Pentecostal upbringing of kookiness and weirdness.
-
And I just wanted to put that stuff away. And
-
it wasn't until I was graduating with my undergrad
-
at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary that
-
one of the professors came in and he just said,
-
hey, read Genesis six. This was literally like
-
right before. We're practicing for graduation.
-
He comes in and he says, uh, into a room, there's
-
about a hundred of us in this room. And he says,
-
uh, here's the four views of Genesis six. You
-
read Genesis six, and then you tell me, you give
-
me a defense for why that is. So I went into
-
the view of set that view mostly because when
-
I read it in context, it feels like. You know,
-
it's going through the genealogy, it's going
-
through, you know, creation, the creation account,
-
the sin account, all that jazz. And we're getting
-
all the genealogy. And then all of a sudden,
-
it's just like, boom, out of nowhere, it feels
-
like where in the world did this come from? And
-
so for me, logically, I was going, all right,
-
well, I'm going logically based on context. Well,
-
something very interesting was all of the Hebrew.
-
scholar majors, those that specialized with their
-
degree in the biblical languages, all held to
-
the Nephilim, sons of God, divine counsel view.
-
I will go into that in just a minute. And I couldn't
-
understand it. And then slowly, I just began
-
to meet people. And then my Hebrew professor,
-
which I will quote a lot of Dr. Michael Heiser,
-
reason being is because he, God rest his soul,
-
he just passed away a year or two ago. But he
-
was a conservative scholar. He's the brainchild
-
behind Logos Bible Software. But he's also the
-
world leading expert on ancient languages. And,
-
and so He he was really influential and for me
-
to start to understand, oh, the Bible is completely
-
supernatural and I can't just in my own discomfort
-
sanitize it because it feels kooky. And he would
-
he was famous for saying in the the weird parts
-
of the Bible are not meant to be explained away,
-
but they're important and for us to truly dig
-
in to understand it. And we should try to understand
-
it from the standpoint of. the way the ancient
-
Hebrews and the early church, like how they understood
-
it. And so the Sethite view would be this, that,
-
oh, it wasn't angels. Sons of God does not mean
-
angels coming down and rebelling against God
-
and having sex with women. It means sons of God,
-
as in Seth, the biblical line of God. cohabitating
-
with the daughters of Cain and creating another,
-
what we would say is a sinful line, not a supernatural
-
line, but just they were conceived in sin, right?
-
So with that being said, that's the Sethite view.
-
I take a now a very literal view of what the
-
sons of God means. And I'm going to give you
-
all the reasons why that is. And so the thing
-
that I would say is most people hold to that
-
interpretation of Genesis six, not because it's
-
biblical and is the most systematic. They hold
-
to it really out of discomfort because they're
-
like, no, that just, that seems too kooky. That
-
seems to much like Greek pantheon gods and all
-
this stuff. And it's like, well, there's something
-
to all that. And so one of the reason that we
-
explain it the way that we do is because the
-
text on its own feels like it's just too strange.
-
And Genesis six is one of those passages that
-
tend to be sanitized a lot. And we try to smooth
-
it out and we try to make it safe. And we turn
-
it into a moral lesson about dating the wrong
-
people when that's not at all what it is. And
-
honestly, it fractures the scriptures completely
-
because the seeds that we find out about in Genesis
-
three, when God talks about the seed, the seed
-
of Eve and the seed of the serpent would be at
-
odds. This comes down to it. And so. you fracture
-
the scriptures and you actually take portions
-
of it out and you mess up a lot of what is actually
-
happening to make the scriptures holistic. And
-
so Genesis six isn't about intermarriage, it's
-
not about marrying someone who's not a Christian
-
or for their sake, like a Jew. Someone or a godly
-
line like that's not what it is at all, but it's
-
actually about an invasion. Yes, I said an invasion
-
because on Mount Hermon. You have these angels
-
who rebel. Actual angels. They rebel against
-
God. And they take and they go where they make
-
a pact and they see the daughters of men. And
-
they're like, you know what, we're going to create
-
our own seed. And what they're trying to do is
-
circumvent Jesus coming, because they knew that
-
that God would have a seed. And so they're trying
-
to circumvent that by creating their own seed.
-
And I already can hear the pushback. I will get
-
to all of that, but let me start here. OK, so
-
let's talk about why Genesis six is angels creating.
-
cohabitating with humans, human women and creating
-
the Nephilim. And so we first have to look at
-
the actual text. And so the meaning of B 'nei
-
Ha Elohim, which that phrase itself, B 'nei Ha
-
Elohim means that's Hebrew for sons of God. So
-
throughout all of the Old Testament, that phrase
-
is used consistently. You see it in Job and it
-
always refers to divine beings or members of
-
a heavenly host. It doesn't refer to. Godly people
-
or the the line of Seth, it just doesn't. And
-
so there is no clear place in the Hebrew Bible
-
where sons of God refers to human beings. Let
-
alone the specific line of Seth, it just it's
-
not there in all of scripture. it always refers
-
to. You can look at Psalm 82. You can look at
-
Job, like I said, everywhere it is. It's always
-
been a hot Elohim. Which refers to heavenly host,
-
not humans. And so the sethite view ask us to
-
accept a meaning of the scripture itself that
-
it never uses. And that's a problem. We cannot
-
look at scripture and go. Well, this makes me
-
feel uncomfortable or this is weird. And so therefore
-
it must be this. And it's only this at this one
-
time and all the other places it refers to heavenly
-
house. We can't do that. We have to be consistent
-
in our interpretation. So that's the first thing.
-
So Bneiha Elohim, what that means and where it's
-
at in scripture. So that's the first thing. Here's
-
the second thing. Now we have to look at the
-
structure of the text. OK, so like I told you,
-
I originally was looking at it in context, OK,
-
genealogies, blah, blah, blah. And then all of
-
a sudden it feels like Genesis six comes out
-
of nowhere. And it's like, what the what in the
-
world is this? Right. But we have to dig into
-
the into where we're at in Genesis six and says,
-
now let's look at the structure of the text.
-
OK, you've got sons of God. Contrasted with the
-
daughters of Adam or the daughters of men, humanity,
-
OK? So if the author wanted to describe two human
-
groups, he had the language to do it because
-
he it's right there. He could have just said
-
the daughters of Cain. He doesn't do that. He
-
could have also just said. Ungodly. I mean, it's
-
all like he has he has the vocabulary to do so.
-
Why would he use Baneha Elohim, sons of God?
-
He doesn't do that, he doesn't say. daughters
-
of Cain or the ungodly, the daughters of the
-
ungodly, whatever. He doesn't do that. Instead,
-
he contrasts when it reads naturally as divine
-
beings with human women. That's just the plain
-
reading of the text. Next, then you've got the
-
Nephilim problem. OK, so then when you hit the
-
whole thing of the Nephilim were on the earth
-
in those days, right? This is where the Sethi
-
view really breaks down and the person that asked
-
a question even said, like, I don't know what
-
to do with the Nephilim then. Yes, because the
-
Nephilim are a special breed that comes out of
-
nowhere. OK, God didn't make them so. Here's
-
the question. Why would the union of two groups
-
of humans produce something abnormal in a whole
-
new race of people? People, Christians marry
-
non -Christians or Christians will have sex with
-
non -Christians. It still happens today. It's
-
happened all throughout time. And we're not seeing
-
giants being born. We're not seeing people with
-
six fingers and six toes be born. And so this
-
is where it breaks down. So when the text says
-
that they cause them Nephilim, it calls them
-
gibberoam or gibberum. which just means mighty
-
men or men of renown. What happens when you marry
-
a believer and a nonbeliever, you don't create
-
a super legendary figure that is incredibly strong,
-
incredibly large, right? I remember I had a professor.
-
When I was asking, this is this is back when
-
I was at a charismatic university and he was
-
over apologetics and I said. uh, what do we do
-
with giants and all this stuff? And he's like,
-
we still have giants today. And I'm like, we
-
do. And he goes, yeah, like they're called the
-
MBA. And it's like, what? No, man, like these,
-
like these people seem bigger than what we see
-
today. Um, and they are because there are actual
-
tombs and things that we have found, uh, that,
-
I mean, even in, even in Genesis, where it talks
-
about Og, Right. And Moses kills Og and or is
-
it Abraham? Abraham or Moses, I can't remember
-
right now, but they kill Og. Og is a giant. He
-
is a king of giants. And it talks about his bed
-
being 20 feet long. We know of tombs that are
-
14, 15, 16 feet long like this. This isn't just
-
about NBA players. OK, this is about huge people
-
with huge strength. And so it it. to get the
-
Nephilim, you have to have some sort of supernatural
-
or I should say unnatural blending of lines.
-
OK, so that's the next thing of why I hold to
-
that. So here's here's another one. Let's talk
-
about the New Testament confirmation. And I'm
-
going to get to the pushback of what about angels
-
can't have sex. OK, I'm going to get to that.
-
But the New Testament doesn't ignore. this view
-
either. So 2 Peter, it talks about how these,
-
there were specific angels that sinned and were
-
cast into Tartarus. Why would they be cast into
-
Tartarus and already put to judgment? And they
-
will face another, the second judgment, but they've
-
already been cast. And why would Jesus go to
-
hell and preach? Like, who's he talking to? Well,
-
seems like these angels Again, Mount Hermon,
-
why would they have taken an oath together to
-
commit this sin against God? Why would it only
-
be these angels sent to Tartarus? What have they
-
had done? And Jude, I'm gonna read Jude. So Jude,
-
verse six, oh man, I just lost my place, here
-
we go. And Jude says this in verse six. And the
-
angels who did not stay within their own position
-
of authority, but left their proper dwelling,
-
he has kept an eternal change under gloomy darkness
-
until the judgment of the great day. And then
-
don't miss the next verse. Just as Sodom and
-
Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise
-
indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural
-
desire, serve as an example. by undergoing a
-
punishment of eternal fire. Did you catch the
-
very next verse? So Jude says that these angels
-
left their proper dwelling and then he immediately
-
connects it to sexual immorality. That connection
-
isn't just random. Like it's there for a purpose.
-
And so these authors aren't inventing something
-
new. They're actually drawing from a shared understanding
-
that is rooted in Genesis six. It's not a breakdown
-
of human genealogy. It's a supernatural rebellion.
-
That's what this is. And so then we've got to
-
we've got to do this. OK, so if we have the sethite
-
view, if we hold the sethite view. All right.
-
Why the flood then? The flood doesn't like. If
-
we just have intermarriage. Between an ungodly
-
and godly person. The flood does not match. It
-
just doesn't. So if we think about the flood
-
and the Sethite view, the cause is intermarriage,
-
right? But does that really justify the destruction
-
of all flesh? And the supernatural view of Genesis
-
six represents something far more serious, right?
-
A violation of the boundaries that God had established
-
between heaven and earth, which is what Jude
-
is talking about. When it says that they left
-
their They went with it. Let me make sure I get
-
it right. They left there. They did not stay
-
within their own position of authority, but left
-
their proper dwelling. And then they they. They
-
take on these women. OK. So. It would make sense
-
that you have a flood that is more than just
-
a moral failure. Because it's about a cosmic
-
rebellion. And that helps explain the scale of
-
the judgment of why God is trying to get rid
-
of. And by the way, what does that mean for Noah?
-
Why would Noah be because Noah wasn't considered
-
perfect. So why would Noah be the chosen one
-
and his family? Because Noah was the only one,
-
quote unquote, from a DNA perspective, considered
-
perfect. He was a true human. and he followed
-
after God. But then how do we get giants after
-
that? Well, if you think about the fact that
-
you have Noah's sons and they had already had
-
wives, you can still have that lineage being
-
passed down. But that's for another time. But
-
here's the biggest pushback, all right? Well,
-
angels can't have sex. Jesus says that. In Matthew
-
22 verse 30, it says that angels Angels are spirits.
-
That's what we say. Angels are spirits. They
-
don't have bodies. And Jesus and Matthew says
-
that they don't marry. Well, yeah, exactly. It
-
says they don't marry. It doesn't say that they
-
can't have sex. So I want you to notice Jesus
-
doesn't say angels are incapable. He just says
-
they don't marry. That's not about their inability
-
to do that. It's more about a role. They don't
-
marry. They don't they don't take unions together
-
to procreate. They don't do that. They don't
-
need to. An angel is a role. It is a job description.
-
It's not a person. An angel just means messenger.
-
And there's many different types of angels. There's
-
many different levels to angels. We can see that
-
in Isaiah and Jeremiah, we can see that in Job,
-
we can see that in Ezekiel. There's different
-
types of angels. They, they, they look different.
-
And so that's what you have to understand is
-
when you use the term angel, it's not, it's a,
-
it's a, you're doing a job description. You're
-
not describing a person. That's like saying a
-
garbage man. If you said garbage man to describe
-
a human, that doesn't make it much sense. Right.
-
And so it's not about an inability to procreate.
-
And Jude six tells us or Jude one six, I should
-
say. tells us that these angels left their proper
-
domain. So whatever happened in Genesis six,
-
it involves stepping outside of what God intended.
-
But then we've got to talk about, well, but they're
-
not physical beings. Okay, well, hold on. Let's
-
talk about the physical nature of spiritual beings.
-
Here's something that we tend to miss, which
-
is why I said this week why I believe that demons
-
are disembodied spirits of Nephilim. not of fallen
-
angels. Okay? In scripture, when spiritual beings
-
appear, they are physical. In Genesis 18, they
-
eat. In Genesis 19, the men of Sodom want to
-
sleep with them. And there's a whole thing I
-
can go down with that on why they want to. But
-
there's no confusion about what they are. They
-
see them as physical. The Bible doesn't present
-
spiritual beings as intangible clouds. Even Jesus,
-
when his resurrected body is physical, he eats.
-
They touch him. They can feel him. They can interact
-
with the physical world. So the idea of them
-
taking on a physical form is not foreign to the
-
text of Genesis 6. It's only foreign to us because
-
it feels weird, right? At the end of the day,
-
the objection often comes because we're trying
-
to force a modern category onto an ancient worldview.
-
So we hear spirit and assume non -material, but
-
the scripture doesn't operate that way. If God
-
can take on flesh, then clearly the line between
-
spiritual and physical is not as rigid as we
-
tend to think that it is. Okay, like they're
-
not a mist. And so the issue in Genesis six,
-
isn't whether it was possible, the issue is that
-
it was forbidden. And so when you begin to see
-
that begins to, the scriptures begin to unfold
-
a whole lot more. So when we talk about the authority
-
of Jesus and what he has given to us, it begins
-
to make a whole lot more sense when he says all
-
authority in heaven and on earth has been given
-
to me and I now give it to you. Like that, that
-
is the crux. Follow scripture. And so here's
-
the bottom line. The Sethite view doesn't arise
-
naturally from the text. It's a reaction to it.
-
And it actually comes from the 14th century,
-
by the way, like that's when it began to come
-
around, because the early church held to a Genesis
-
six of you. That's also why Moses doesn't give
-
us this long thing about long diatribe, about.
-
Nephilim and whatever, because his. His readers
-
would have already known what they are. They
-
would have already known the story. They would
-
have already they've seen giants themselves like
-
they know all this stuff. It's just us in the
-
modern world that goes as this is weird. And
-
so we attempt to make it comfortable and more
-
explainable, so it's less supernatural. But Genesis
-
six isn't trying to be comfortable for us. It's
-
showing us a world where rebellion isn't just
-
human, it's cosmic. It's something different.
-
It's out of this world. And if we flatten that,
-
we might be missing out on something that the
-
original authors fully expected us to see. And
-
if we flatten it, we put the scripture in parts
-
and then hope that it makes sense and you can't
-
do that. We have to see it through the lens with
-
which it was given to us and read it that way.
-
through an ancient lens, not a modern lens. OK.
-
So. Let me give you some resources that you can
-
go read yourself. OK, so I talked about this
-
past Sunday, The Unseen Realm by Dr. Michael
-
Heiser. I'm going to just tell you, Dr. Heiser
-
is not an easy read because most of his books.
-
are are a lot of footnotes that are deep, like
-
half the page will literally be footnotes because
-
he's just pointing you to scripture over and
-
over and over and over and over and over and
-
over. He's pointing you to scripture and ancient
-
text over and over because he's giving you all
-
the evidence for this. It's not just his take.
-
It is the actual like this. This is what it says.
-
Here's here's you see it for yourself. He also
-
has a book called Reversing Hermon, which is
-
about that rebellion that I talked about. It's
-
a more focused look specifically on Genesis six
-
and its implications in the New Testament. He
-
wrote an easier kind of read that of the unseen
-
realm called Supernatural. It's just a simplified
-
version of the unseen realm. It's probably a
-
good starting point for those of you that feel
-
like I don't really want to get into a textbook
-
per se. First, Enoch. Now, Pastor Logan. Enoch
-
is not in the Bible. I know. I know. And I'm
-
not saying it's canon, but it is quoted by June,
-
Jude, and it is quoted by Peter and it is quoted
-
by Paul. Okay. Um, so there has to be something
-
to it. Now, the first 32 chapters, I think are
-
more on point. The rest of it is trash. That
-
was, we know is, was like added later and blah,
-
blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay. But at least Just
-
familiarize yourself with it. I'm not saying
-
it's scripture. Don't hear me saying it's scripture.
-
OK. But it does get quoted by the writers of
-
scripture, so we should at least familiarize
-
ourselves with it. It also helps us how, by the
-
way, how ancient Jews would have interpreted
-
Genesis six. Now, what if we wanted to have something
-
that's more balanced? OK. You've given us a lot
-
about Dr. Michael Heiser. Yeah, because again,
-
he was my professor. He's just an incredible
-
man who loved the Lord, loved Jesus, always pointed
-
us to Christ. Very biblical, always pointed us
-
to the Bible. And I just got the chance to interact
-
with him personally. So I trust him in that.
-
But let me give you another one. The Genesis
-
six conspiracy by Gary Bates gives you the contrasting
-
perspectives that critique both views. There's
-
a book called Giants. The Giants' Sons of the
-
Gods. And it's by Douglas Van Dorn, who is a
-
conservative pastor in Denver. And he gives you
-
a really in -depth look at Nephilim, Giants,
-
all that jazz. And then there's a book called
-
Demons by Dr. Michael Heiser as well, which explores
-
how Genesis 6 connects to later biblical demonology,
-
which is what I got into this past week. All
-
that being said, I hope that this was helpful.
-
I hope that it helps give you. Makes you want
-
to dive a little bit deeper, but helps hopefully
-
helps you see, yeah, the Bible is more supernatural
-
than I thought. I'm not expecting this to change
-
your mind. I want you to be the one that physically
-
dives in yourself. You physically dive in yourself.
-
To see what it is that the scriptures are about
-
your. systematic interpretation of the scriptures,
-
your defense of where you are. But don't ever
-
let your own discomfort be the reason why that
-
you are unwilling to take the Bible at face value,
-
because that's just not being honest like so.
-
Keep asking questions, keep searching the scriptures,
-
because that's what a good believer does. I love
-
each and every single one of you. Thanks so much
-
for listening. If you've got any more questions,
-
always reach out to me, text me, message me on
-
Facebook, email me. You know how to get a hold
-
of me. Love you guys. We'll see you. Hopefully
-
you can join me. If you are not a part of Crested
-
Corners on Church, we are in O 'Neill, Nebraska,
-
and would love to have you come visit us any
-
time. Thanks so much. Have a great day. We'll
-
see you Sunday. Bye bye.