Sermon
Principles for Marriage Life, 6/21/26
Publisher transcript
Transcript
-
Today we continue in our study of the book of
-
1 Corinthians. As we have been going through
-
this, we're going through it chapter by chapter,
-
mostly verse by verse, seeking to understand
-
what the will of God is for our lives and what
-
His Word speaks to us as it was written. In this
-
case, written to the church at Corinth by the
-
Apostle Paul. Now, as we are going through this
-
particular passage, this can be a bit awkward
-
sometimes, or we can think of it in that way
-
as we're dealing with some of the more personal
-
lives, especially of marriage. But I would just
-
urge you to look at the word, and I, by God's
-
grace, will preach it to you as best as I am
-
able in an appropriate way. Today, we are looking
-
at principles for married life. which is going
-
to be all through this passage. And our subject
-
today is particularly the more intimate part
-
of marriage. Having dealt clearly and distinctly
-
with the problem of sexual immorality in the
-
previous chapter, the Apostle Paul now turns
-
to principles for marriage. He has given to us
-
the prohibitions against sexual immorality. But
-
now he addresses the proper use of God's good
-
gift of the sexual relationship between a man
-
and a woman in marriage, as well as a number
-
of other instructions and counsel. Let's read
-
this passage. We're looking today at verses one
-
through nine. Now concerning the things of which
-
you wrote to me, it is good for a man not to
-
touch a woman. Nevertheless, because of sexual
-
immorality, let each man have his own wife and
-
let each woman have her own husband. Let the
-
husband render to his wife the affection due
-
her, and likewise also the wife to her husband.
-
The wife does not have authority over her own
-
body, but the husband does. And likewise, the
-
husband does not have authority over his own
-
body, but the wife. Do not deprive one another
-
except with consent for a time that you may give
-
yourself to fasting and prayer and come together
-
again so that Satan does not tempt you because
-
of your lack of self -control. But I say this
-
as a concession, not as a commandment, for I
-
wish that all men were even as I myself. But
-
each one has his own gift from God, one in this
-
manner and another in that. But I say to the
-
unmarried and to the widows, it is good for them
-
if they remain even as I am. But if they cannot
-
exercise self -control, let them marry. For it
-
is better to marry than to burn with passion.
-
Let's pray. Father, we come to you, Lord, in
-
this scripture and we ask, O Lord, as there is
-
so much here. and there are some things that
-
are a bit difficult to understand. I pray that
-
you would open up our hearts and minds, that
-
you would give us the power of the Holy Spirit
-
to be able to understand. And Lord, I pray that
-
as we look at this subject, that we might do
-
so in the fear of the Lord and with wisdom. Please,
-
Lord, guide us this day, for we need you. In
-
Jesus' name, amen. This chapter begins a response
-
about matters. that were written in a letter
-
by the church at Corinth to Paul. Up until now,
-
Paul's been addressing matters reported to him
-
by Clow, as well as other members of the congregation
-
probably reported to him in person. Now there's
-
a shift. This shift begins in this chapter with
-
these words, Now concerning the things of which
-
you wrote to me. He chose to organize this follow
-
-up. to the prohibitions and problem with sexual
-
immorality that he dealt with in chapters 5 and
-
chapter 6. But he now shifts to answering their
-
questions. In this chapter, Paul will address
-
four different aspects of marriage, along with
-
a section on Christian calling and responsibility.
-
The sections are as follows. There is the section
-
on marriage and celibacy, which is verse 1 through
-
9. Then there is a section on marriage and divorce,
-
which we're going to look at in verse 10 through
-
16, Lord willing, next week. There's one then
-
on Christian calling and responsibility, verses
-
17 to 24. Then there's one section on marriage
-
and virgins, verses 25 to 38. And finally, he
-
deals with marriage and the remarriage of widows
-
in verses 39 and 40. I expect to be in this chapter
-
for a little while. I expect there will probably
-
be four or five sermons in order to do justice
-
to the many wonderful precepts and the clear
-
instructions that are given here. I do want to
-
take one tangent, though, as I plan to explore
-
the subject of the status of the children of
-
believers. In verse 14, as the apostle declares
-
that they are not unclean, but holy. So I intend
-
to deal with that fairly thoroughly. Going back
-
now to the passage before us, Pastor Bill Einwechter,
-
whom I served with for a number of years in Pennsylvania,
-
he preached through this book and it was very
-
helpful in my own life. And in listening to this
-
sermon on this passage again, He outlines four
-
competing perspectives that created confusion
-
in the Corinthian church. And I think they are
-
very helpful in understanding this passage. So
-
I share them with you. These perspectives are
-
gleaned from inference in the Bible and from
-
other historical sources. But it helps us to
-
understand a little bit what was going on. just
-
as it is here and it is a whole number of places
-
in the book of Corinthians, Paul doesn't give
-
the questions that were answered. He only responds
-
to them. So we have to kind of figure out what
-
were the questions or what were the issues that
-
were going on. So there's these four perspectives.
-
So first of all, within the Corinthian church,
-
there was the Jewish view. And that is that marriage
-
was considered obligatory. It is a religious
-
duty. Young men were expected to marry somewhere
-
between ages 16 to 18. Remaining unmarried at
-
age 20 was viewed with high suspicion. You know,
-
kind of a, you know, you better get with it here.
-
Okay, so that was at age 20. Very different than
-
it is today. So there was the Jewish view. Then
-
there was the ascetic view. Now, that's not aesthetics
-
as in beauty. It's ascetic as in denying bodily
-
things. Okay, in other words, being real strict
-
about certain things and denying of the material
-
world. They taught that self -denial, especially
-
of physical pleasures, elevated one's spiritual
-
standing. In other words, you could get closer
-
to God if you would deny your body in a whole
-
number of things, including the marriage relationship.
-
And so celibacy was prized as the superior calling,
-
but then sex, even with marriage, was seen as
-
demeaning, and they would encourage married couples
-
to stop as well. So these were the ascetics,
-
and they are referred to a number of times in
-
the New Testament, but they were there in Corinth.
-
Thirdly, there were the libertines. That is,
-
they held a low view of the marriage covenant,
-
and they divorced and remarried with ease. Oh
-
sure, I'm tired of you or whatever. Okay, I'm
-
going to divorce you and I'm going to marry you
-
again. It's not a big deal. So there were the
-
libertines. Finally then, there were the legalists.
-
That is, they believed that unequally yoked marriages,
-
that is the marriage of a believer and an unbeliever,
-
that they should be dissolved. In other words,
-
they need to separate. And of course for this,
-
they would draw on Old Testament examples from
-
Ezra and Nehemiah where that took place. And
-
we'll see that being referred to in the portion
-
from 10 to 16. So these four things help us to
-
understand why Paul addresses some of the things
-
that he does in this chapter. Finally then, before
-
we go on to the main points of verses 1 to 9,
-
consider again the cultural context. Corinth
-
was notorious. for unrestrained sexual immorality.
-
Temple and party prostitutes and others of every
-
kind were readily available in large numbers.
-
Many, if not most, Roman or Greek husbands would
-
not take sexual delight in their wife for she
-
was only for creation and to bear legitimate
-
heirs. Sexual pleasure was found in others, slaves,
-
mistresses, courtesans, prostitutes, etc. This
-
context must be kept in mind as we read this
-
chapter for Paul completely upends the culture.
-
And that is that Christian believers were to
-
set a whole new standard for marriage relationships.
-
One that conformed to the word of God given in
-
the Old Testament as well as the teachings of
-
Jesus directly and through the apostles that
-
built upon that foundation. We see a key background,
-
or we see a key text that really helps to understand
-
this background of Christian fidelity back in
-
the book of Proverbs. Proverbs chapter 5, verse
-
15 to 21, which is a powerful and a poetic exhortation
-
on sexual fidelity in marriage and the joy of
-
exclusive marital intimacy. God's word says,
-
Proverbs 5, verse 15 through 21. Drink water
-
from your own cistern and running water from
-
your own well. Should your fountains be dispersed
-
abroad, streams of water in the streets, let
-
them only be your own and not for strangers with
-
you. Let your fountain be blessed and rejoice
-
with the wife of your youth. As a loving dear
-
and a graceful doe, let her breasts satisfy you
-
at all times and always be enraptured with her
-
love. For why should you, my son? be enraptured
-
by an immoral woman and be embraced in the arms
-
of a seductress. For the ways of man are before
-
the eyes of the Lord and he ponders all his paths.
-
This is the biblical teaching and Paul is building
-
on this and he is applying it to the Corinthian
-
church completely and diametrically in opposition
-
to the culture of the day. Therefore, now, Building
-
on this, he goes through and expounds on these
-
principles. So let's consider the text and profit
-
thereby. The first is in verse 1. This is Paul's
-
response to the Corinthian question. He says,
-
Now concerning the things of which you wrote
-
to me. As I said, Paul now shifts to answering
-
questions or dealing with matters sent to him
-
by letter. We do not have record of these questions,
-
but we can infer them from the passage. He then
-
says, it is good for a man not to touch a woman.
-
Now, this particular phrase is a little difficult
-
to understand. So I'm going to try to unpack
-
it for you, but there's really two different
-
ways to look at it and then two different ways
-
in one of the ways. So I'll try to make it simple,
-
but I want to unpack it. What is he talking about
-
here? It is good for a man to touch a woman.
-
So not to touch a woman. Well, the first is.
-
there's a possibility that Paul is restating
-
or quoting the position of some in Corinth. In
-
other words, this is part of it. Concerning the
-
things you wrote to me, it is good for a man
-
not to touch a woman. In other words, they are
-
saying that it is good for a man not to touch
-
a woman as to use a woman for sexual gratification
-
either in or out of the married state. Biblical
-
Greek did not use quotation marks. So any quotes...
-
must be taken from the context and grammar. So
-
this would have been said against the other Corinthian
-
view that sex is a necessity, like eating or
-
drinking. In other words, Paul could be quoting
-
the ascetics, the one who thought that marital
-
intimacy should never happen even if you are
-
married. And if you're not married, don't get
-
married. Now, if this is the correct interpretation,
-
the rest of my comments about this verse are
-
still valid. However... I don't think that's
-
what's happening here. I could be wrong, but
-
I don't think so. I take this verse, not as a
-
quote from the ascetics, but as a statement by
-
Paul to the Corinthians. It is good for a man
-
not to touch a woman. What then does he mean?
-
The word touch. is not referring to a handshake,
-
a hug, or social touching in that way. Although
-
the word was sometimes used in that way, such
-
as a woman with a discharge of blood who touched
-
Jesus. Touch also means to fasten oneself to
-
or to cling to. This is in the Greek. And thirdly,
-
it can mean carnal intercourse or cohabitation
-
with a woman. But in Greek literature of the
-
day, it was mostly used as a sexual reference,
-
especially in an exploitative way, acting out
-
of a desire to take advantage of someone through
-
self -gratification. Therefore, I think the proper
-
understanding here is that touch is a sexual
-
euphemism, which could be referring to the marriage
-
act, or it is more likely... That Paul is addressing
-
the actual act with a woman who is not your wife.
-
And using that woman for personal gratification.
-
It is most likely referring to the kind of touching.
-
As is used in Proverbs chapter 6 verse 29. So
-
is he who goes into his neighbor's wife. Whoever
-
touches her shall not be innocent. Now granted.
-
It is possible, based on Paul's statement in
-
verses 7 and 8 and 26 and 28, that Paul is saying
-
it is good for a man not to come together in
-
marriage and have that marriage relationship.
-
And he does so, as he explains later, because
-
of the present distress and so that each one
-
remains in the state that they are. Now, if so,
-
this verse affirms the value and goodness of
-
singleness. and of sexual abstinence in certain
-
contexts, such as Paul's own example and also
-
Jesus' teaching in Matthew 19 that there are
-
some that make themselves eunuchs for the kingdom
-
of heaven. Either way, Paul is not giving a blanket
-
condemnation of marriage or of sex, but a recognition
-
that undivided devotion to the Lord can be facilitated
-
by singleness. and beneficial in times of great
-
upheaval, of distress, or famine. We'll deal
-
with this later when we get to verse 32 to 35.
-
There are certain benefits in certain limited
-
contexts and calling, but celibacy is not biblically
-
superior to marriage. Nor does this verse contradict
-
God's original command at creation. When God
-
himself says it is not good for man to be alone.
-
Genesis chapter 2 verse 18. So my contention
-
here is that Paul in this is not arguing for
-
the inherent superiority of singleness. But as
-
Wesley states for the prudence of remaining in
-
one's current state during difficult times. So
-
putting this all together. Does Paul here have
-
a low view of marriage? Is this what he is expressing
-
here? That it's good for a man not to be married?
-
Some argue that. From this passage and from others
-
in the chapter that he does. That the best place
-
for a Christian is to be single, undistracted
-
by the cares of a spouse and the earthiness of
-
sexual union. There have been many cultic groups
-
who teach this. Where we lived in Pennsylvania,
-
there's a museum called the Ephrata Cloister.
-
And it was there where, a couple hundred years
-
ago, Seventh Day Baptists, so they were Baptist
-
Sabbatarians who worshipped only on Saturday.
-
And they created some type of a commune there.
-
And this is one of the things that they taught.
-
So everyone who came and lived there was not
-
to be married. Most of them were singles, but
-
even the ones who did come, there were some times
-
when a wife would come or where a husband would
-
come or even when a couple would come, and then
-
they had to agree to abstain from any kind of
-
sexual relationship because this was ungodly.
-
It wasn't right. It's not right to do this. It's
-
just a whole kind of weird thing. There are many
-
others, and it's often, just as an aside, Cultic
-
groups or cults will either go to that side or
-
they'll go completely to the other where everything's
-
okay. Everyone belongs to everybody else and
-
it's a whole thing like that. And there's been
-
many like that as well. Anyway, some have taught
-
this. There's also a theme that runs. Of course,
-
you know, we see the amount of singles that we
-
have in the church today at large in the United
-
States, and so there's some who try to justify
-
that by saying, well, it's really more holy to
-
be married, or it's a better thing not to be
-
married, or it's because then you can give to
-
the Lord, and there's lots of people that can
-
have the gift of singleness. I don't think Paul
-
is teaching that here, and as you will see as
-
I go through this. Paul does not have a low view
-
of marriage, nor is it inferior. So consider,
-
Paul wrote Ephesians 5, which depicts the beauty
-
and mystery of marriage as a picture of Christ
-
in the church. He wrote that passage. How could
-
he have a low view of marriage? It's impossible.
-
Furthermore, in the book of 1 Timothy, three
-
times, 1 Timothy 3, Elders and deacons must be
-
the husband of one wife. It was, you know, of
-
course it was dealing with, was he dealing with
-
polygamy or was he dealing with infidelity? There's
-
all sorts of things which we went through that
-
when I preached through that passage. But the
-
whole point here is, if they're married, they
-
need to be the husband of one wife. And marriage
-
is a good qualification because their children
-
are an example of their leadership abilities.
-
Paul writes that. He does not have a low view
-
of marriage. A chapter later, in 1 Timothy 4,
-
verse 3, Paul says, Paul himself, the same writer,
-
he says that false teachers give heed to doctrines
-
of demons. And what do they do? They forbid to
-
marry. It is the doctrine of demons. Here's the
-
verse. Now the Spirit expressly says that in
-
latter times some will depart from the faith,
-
giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines
-
of demons, speaking lies and hypocrisy, having
-
their own conscience seared with a hot iron,
-
forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain
-
from foods which God created to be received with
-
thanksgiving by those who believe and know the
-
truth. A mark of cultish behavior is that they
-
mess with biblical doctrine on food, And on sex.
-
It happens all the time. Even now. So there again.
-
That's the doctrine of demons. To forbid to marry.
-
And then finally in 1st Timothy 5 verse 14. Paul
-
encourages the younger widows. To marry. He says
-
I would. That the younger women. The widows marry.
-
Which can also be extrapolated to others. So.
-
Paul does not have a low view of marriage. Therefore
-
I conclude. That the first or the best and the
-
strongest meaning of this verse is that Paul
-
is saying it is not good for a man to live in
-
sexual union outside of marriage. Then he continues
-
right on in verse 2. Nevertheless, because of
-
sexual immorality, let each man have his own
-
wife and let each woman have her own husband.
-
This brings us to our second point. That is the
-
necessity and goodness of marriage in light.
-
Of immorality. Marriage is the God ordained context.
-
For sexual relationships. So the act itself.
-
Is good. It is right. It is blessed by God. It
-
is ordained by God. Between a husband and a wife.
-
Everything outside of that. Is sin. The word
-
pornea. It is immorality. Which covers everything.
-
That is unlawful. Everything. God created. This
-
strong urge and drive. It is part of the original
-
dominion mandate given to Adam and Eve in Genesis
-
chapter 1 verse 28. What does he tell them? Be
-
fruitful and multiply. Fill the earth and subdue
-
it. How are you going to do that if you don't
-
have a relationship together? No. This is part
-
of it right there. Again, after Noah came out
-
of the ark, the same command was repeated to
-
him and to his offspring. Genesis 9 verse 7.
-
And as for you, be fruitful and multiply. Bring
-
forth abundantly in the earth and multiply in
-
it. Excuse me. Why was it not good for man to
-
be alone? Well, there's certainly a whole number
-
of reasons why it's not good for man to be alone.
-
Why man needs a helper who is suitable for him.
-
I can sure attest to that, and I think all of
-
you here can. There's a lot of reasons why we
-
need a wife, men. Yes, but there's a primary
-
one that's right here. The first one is that
-
he cannot bear any offspring by himself. There
-
is no next generation. He must be fruitful and
-
multiply and so he needs a wife. God created
-
the complementary parts of a man and a woman
-
and he gave them the desire within and they come
-
together in marriage and sexual union. This intense
-
and overpowering desire is found in nearly all
-
human beings. Thus if there is no marriage, most
-
men and a lot of women will fall into sexual
-
immorality if there is no marriage. Paul teaches
-
the answer to this problem. Because of sexual
-
immorality, let each one, each man, have his
-
own wife, and the woman have her own husband.
-
To have not only indicates getting married or
-
taking a wife but also the regular mutual satisfaction
-
of sexual desires. The word own, his own wife
-
or her own husband signifies belonging to each
-
other and to no one else in the same way. Belonging
-
to each other. They are their own, his own wife,
-
her own husband. This also by the way speaks.
-
of one wife and one husband. This is an emphasis
-
both on monogamy and fidelity. Monogamy being
-
one man, one woman, not one man, multiple wives,
-
or polygamy. Polygamy does not fit with this.
-
I think this is an additional New Testament teaching
-
on it. Paul teaches this as a practical safeguard
-
against the sexual temptations prevalent in Corinth.
-
and in every culture. If a husband and wife do
-
not come together frequently, the temptation
-
becomes very strong. With the abundance of available
-
sexual partners, and with the cultural view that
-
sex was like any other bodily urge, like hunger
-
or thirst, immorality was the norm. The answer
-
is certainly self -discipline under the rule
-
of Christ in the heart, but it is also the sexual
-
relationship between a husband and a wife. Paul's
-
going to develop this now in the next few verses.
-
Number three, mutual marital duties and authority
-
in the marriage bed. These are verses three to
-
five. Let the husband render to his wife the
-
affection due her, and likewise also the wife
-
to her husband. The wife does not have authority
-
over her own body, but the husband does. And
-
likewise the husband does not have authority
-
over his own body, but the wife does. Do not
-
deprive one another, except with consent for
-
a time, that you may give yourselves to fasting
-
and prayer, and come together again, so that
-
Satan does not tempt you because of your lack
-
of self -control. Let's unpack this a little
-
more. First of all, there's mutual sexual obligation
-
in marriage. Verse 3. The physical relationship
-
in a marriage is not an option. Paul speaks here
-
of obligations. That is of duty. A mutual obligation
-
and duty to each other. Where husbands and wives
-
are to regularly fulfill their responsibilities
-
one to another. It's what render means. Render
-
the affection due means that you are to deliver.
-
You are to discharge what is due. You are to
-
give. And the tense is a continuous one. That
-
is an ongoing, generous, mutual giving, not merely
-
a duty, but also a delight. This rendering the
-
affection due is to be done from the husband
-
to the wife and from the wife to the husband.
-
Now, the immediate context of this verse, though,
-
is not procreation. It is not just coming together
-
so that you can have children. It is rather affection.
-
Affection, also translated as benevolence or
-
kindness or goodwill. The word is used elsewhere,
-
spoken by Paul to servants. who are in Ephesians
-
6, 5, and 8, to do the will of God from the heart
-
and with good will doing service. Duties and
-
obligations are all throughout life, and we are
-
not to do them grudgingly or half -heartedly
-
or with clenched teeth or manipulatively, but
-
willingly, generously, and with good will toward
-
each other. The command here is to give love,
-
to give affection, not to command it or demand
-
it. It is full of reciprocity, of mutual love
-
and satisfaction, caring for one another and
-
giving to one another willingly. That's the meaning
-
here, to render that which is due. Secondly,
-
in verse 4, there is mutual authority over each
-
one's body. The wife's body belongs to her husband.
-
The husband's body belongs to his wife. This
-
is a profound statement of mutual authority.
-
This is not just the husband possessing. No,
-
it is authority in both the wife and the husband,
-
each one over the other one. And so there is
-
a mutual belonging. It is a self -giving love
-
and it is a rejection of selfish autonomy in
-
marriage. I am in my own person. I can do what
-
I want. No, if you're a married person, you need
-
to do things on the basis for your wife and use
-
a wife for your husband. That's what the word
-
is saying here. We owe it to each other. And
-
in fact, not only do we owe it, we have authority
-
over. Now, let's be clear here. The authority
-
over each other's body must be exercised with
-
love, tenderness, communication, and understanding
-
let me repeat that the authority over each other's
-
body must be exercised with love with tenderness
-
with communication and understanding understanding
-
the needs of the other but also considerate of
-
the other's exhaustion or the time of the natural
-
cycles of the body there are temptations for
-
both the wife and the husband as the drive is
-
often more intense in the husband He can easily
-
be tempted to be controlling or dominating or
-
domineering. The wife can easily be tempted to
-
use the relationship as a way to manipulate,
-
as a reward for good behavior, or to withhold
-
because of actions or behavior that she dislikes.
-
No, the mutual obligation is not to be used for
-
control or manipulation, as it often happens.
-
The kind of thing, if you will, well then I will.
-
Would you like this? Okay, well, then you do
-
this. That kind of thing. No, it's a mutual love
-
for one another and a responsibility to each
-
other. The other thing that's profound here is
-
with the wife having authority over the husband,
-
that means that he's also restrained by her.
-
Remember, again, the context and culture of the
-
day. There was much availability. And with the
-
wife's authority over him, she was able to remind
-
him, I'm for you and you need to be true to me.
-
You can't go do this. There's also that kind
-
of thing. So you belong to each other. Now keep
-
in mind, the calendar should not be rigid. You
-
both need to communicate your needs to each other.
-
And you can't forget about grace. You cannot
-
forget about grace. These instructions show.
-
that husbands and wives should not be prudish
-
toward each other, but should be able to communicate
-
openly these things, talking about their sexual
-
needs and limitations to each other. Then he
-
moves on in verse 5 to a warning against deprivation.
-
Do not... deprive one another do not deprive
-
or defraud is a very strong imperative in the
-
greek it's like this stop doing it stop depriving
-
each other stop it that's how strong it is some
-
couples were already withholding for ascetic
-
reasons saying no it's more spiritual not to
-
so we need to do that and using that control
-
or others or Some were doing it in immorality
-
with others. Stop doing it. The verb translated
-
deprive usually means to cause another to suffer
-
loss by taking away through illicit means. It
-
is translated to rob, to steal, to despoil, or
-
to defraud. It is used in James to describe the
-
withholding of wages due to the hired man. And
-
it's completely condemned in scripture. So to
-
withhold the marriage relationship from each
-
other in marriage or to use it to control or
-
manipulate is to go against a very clear command
-
of God. He says, stop doing it. Do not do this.
-
Now, just as a side note, if you're in a troubled
-
situation or a difficult one, if one or the other
-
is withholding against the commands of God. That
-
is no excuse for the other to find fulfillment
-
elsewhere. There's no excuse for that. God's
-
word does not give license to say, well, my wife's
-
not meeting my needs, so that gives me the freedom
-
to go out and do this and find someone else.
-
Though it can be very difficult, self -control
-
is still required, and God grants grace and ability
-
for that. Self -control is one of the fruits
-
of the Spirit. Moving back, this mutual bond
-
is deep and powerful. Husbands, study your wife.
-
Learn to meet her needs and how to physically
-
satisfy her. Wives, recognize your husband's
-
frequent need for intimacy to maintain the bond.
-
Defrauding each other or one another greatly
-
increases temptation to sin because God designed
-
us as sexual beings. That is not crass. That
-
is not weird. No, God designed it that way. It
-
is by creation. Violating this command has destroyed
-
many marriages and destroyed the bond that happens
-
as married couples come together. Now the apostle
-
then goes on to grant one exception to this obligation
-
and duty. And this is if by mutual agreement
-
for a limited time. Since the authority over
-
the wife's body belongs to the husband and the
-
authority over the husband's body belongs to
-
the wife, then the decision to abstain may not
-
be made only by the one. It may not be. It must
-
be an agreed upon decision by both. Perhaps the
-
couple determines to fast or to pray regarding
-
something and they choose together to fast in
-
this area also. This could be a time of focused
-
prayer and fasting. Temporary abstinence is permitted
-
only under these four criteria. Number one, mutual
-
consent. Number two, for a specific stated time.
-
Number three, for a God -honoring purpose. And
-
number four, with a clear plan to resume relations
-
later or afterward. Those four, they're right
-
here, four criteria. Now, Paul gives this one.
-
Are there other exceptions? Is there a possibility
-
that there are? We do find a few others in the
-
Bible and also in practically speaking. For example,
-
Leviticus 12 in the ceremonial law gives a certain
-
time period after the birth of a son and of a
-
daughter where there is not a coming together.
-
Of course, that can also be for health reasons,
-
but I think there was also a ceremonial aspect
-
there as well as the purification of the blood
-
that Leviticus 12 goes into. I'm not going to
-
get into it today. I'm just putting it there
-
that that was part of it. It was also understood
-
in the time of war when men go away to battle
-
or travel, go to sea for an extended time. Notably,
-
it was set forth that any man who... who wanted
-
to go home to his wife instead of going to battle
-
was allowed to choose to do so. It was not forced
-
conscription in the army throughout all of the
-
Old Testament. It was designed where they were
-
allowed. If they wanted to go home, they could.
-
In each of these cases, though, these four criteria
-
should be met. Mutual consent for a specified
-
and stated time. for a God -honoring purpose,
-
and with a clear plan to resume relations afterward.
-
Husbands, I'm going to say this. The husband
-
should not make extended travel plans without
-
the consent of the wife. I think that's one of
-
the things that we can draw from this that's
-
pretty clear. And that's, I say, extended for
-
a longer time. Paul speaks of the danger of prolonged
-
deprivation, and he tells married couples to
-
come together again, that is to have ongoing
-
intimacy so that Satan does not tempt you. This
-
is to drink from your own cistern, as Proverbs
-
5 speaks. Why is this? Because Satan exploits
-
lack of self -control and provides many temptations
-
to immorality. This is the warning that he gives
-
here in verse 5. That Satan does not tempt you
-
because of your lack of self -control. Number
-
4 then, he deals with a concession. A concession
-
regarding abstinence, singleness, and self -control.
-
Verses 6 to 9. And this will be the last major
-
point. I say this, he says, as a concession,
-
not as a commandment. For I wish that all men
-
were even as I myself. But each one has his own
-
gift from God, one in this manner and another
-
in that. But I say to the married and to the
-
widows, it is good for them if they remain even
-
as I am. But if they cannot exercise self -control,
-
let them marry. For it is better to marry than
-
to burn with passion. Now again here we're getting
-
into some things and tenses like, okay, what
-
exactly is the apostle trying to bring home here
-
to us? I'll give you some things, but obviously
-
I may not be completely comprehensive. There's
-
a lot in here. First of all, he says, but I say
-
this as a concession, not as a command. To what
-
is Paul conceding and not commanding? Is it the
-
whole idea of marriage and for the possibility
-
of living a single life? Is that what he's saying
-
here? I'm giving all of this in this passage
-
just by concession? I don't think so. Certainly
-
where he says, do not deprive one another. That
-
is not conciliatory speech. It's command. Don't
-
do this. So I don't think he's conceding this.
-
I think rather that he's giving a concession
-
on the possibility of temporary abstinence in
-
verse 5. This might be an acknowledgement to
-
the ascetics that it would be okay to defer relations
-
for a time of spiritual renewal or prayer and
-
fasting, but only for a time. In other words,
-
he gives permission to cease from obeying his
-
commands in verses two to five, but only on a
-
temporary basis. I think that might be what he
-
is saying there. I speak this as a concession.
-
Then he goes on and says, for I wish that all
-
men were even as myself. All right. Now we know
-
that Paul was unmarried, that he was celibate.
-
Although he may have been married at one time,
-
there is some conjecture about that. So is Paul
-
saying here that I wish that all people would
-
be unmarried? I don't think so. This interpretation
-
goes against many other scriptures. Alfred Barnes
-
put it in a way that I think is really good.
-
He says that Paul was unmarried is evident from
-
1 Corinthians 9 verse 5. But he does not refer
-
to this fact here. While he wishes that all people
-
were like himself, he evidently does not intend
-
that he would prefer that all should be unmarried.
-
For this would be against the divine institution
-
and against his own precepts elsewhere. He would
-
be glad if all people had control over their
-
passions and propensities as he had. Had the
-
gift of continence and could abstain from marriage
-
when circumstances of trial, etc. would make
-
it proper. End quote. I think what he's saying
-
here is, I wish that all could be self -controlled
-
as I am. I believe that is what he is saying,
-
that all men were as myself. Paul's wish is that
-
each person would be content with their own station
-
in life. That is that they would have the gift
-
of contentedness from God. Some have the gift
-
of celibacy and singleness. And there are certain
-
advantages that come with that gift in the service
-
of Christ. Especially in difficult circumstances.
-
Others have the gift of marriage. They should
-
be content with that. Paul was gifted with confidence,
-
with self -control. He was able to go on those
-
long missionary journeys in a way that would
-
have been impossible if accompanied by his wife.
-
Hear this long list of what he gives in 2 Corinthians
-
11 verse 24. And imagine how this would be if
-
he had a wife to care for during this time. Here's
-
what he said. For from the Jews five times I
-
received forty stripes minus one. Three times
-
I was beaten with rods. Once I was stoned. Three
-
times I was shipwrecked. A night and a day I
-
have been in the deep. In journeys often. In
-
perils of waters. In perils of robbers. In perils
-
of my own countrymen. In perils of the Gentiles.
-
In perils of the city. In perils in the wilderness.
-
In perils in the sea. In perils among false brethren.
-
in weariness and toil, in sleeplessness often,
-
in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold
-
and nakedness, besides the other things, what
-
comes upon me daily, my deep concern for all
-
the churches. Now imagine the difficulty of caring
-
for and maintaining a wife in those circumstances.
-
Practically impossible. And Paul was content
-
in his calling. And thus he refers, I wish that
-
all men were even as myself. To the unmarried
-
and widows, he says it is good for them if they
-
remain even as I am. In verse 8, the unmarried
-
and widows, Paul mentions, may include widowers
-
as the Greek term is masculine and lacked a specific
-
word for widower or was used very seldom. So
-
it's probably referring here to both widows and
-
widowers. Again, he is urging contentedness in
-
their single life, but as he states in verse
-
9, if they cannot exercise self -control, let
-
them marry, for it is better to marry than to
-
burn with passion. This is realistic pastoral
-
counsel. Yes, self -control is great, but it's
-
better to marry honorably than to be consumed
-
by uncontrolled lust, on fire with passion. And
-
this is a good word for us to apply in various
-
ways. Finally then, let's look at a few applications.
-
Number one, marriage is a legitimate and good
-
outlet for sexual desire and it is a profound
-
covenant that reflects the gospel. It reflects
-
the gospel and it reflects the church of Jesus
-
Christ. It is a picture of that. It is the normal
-
way for a man and a woman to live and God blesses
-
it. Second, if you are a young single person,
-
pray for a wife or a husband. Unless you have
-
a clear sense and contentment that God is calling
-
you to live a single life for his glory. Otherwise,
-
pray. Pray that God would lead you to a wife.
-
or to a husband. Prepare yourself in the worship
-
of God and in self -discipline and pray that
-
God would sovereignly bring you to that person.
-
If you're a man, actively seek a wife unless
-
there's a present distress, as Paul writes later
-
in the chapter in verses 26 and 27. Third, if
-
you're a widow or widower, be content with your
-
station in life, but open to the possibilities
-
that might come. However, if you're a young widow,
-
Paul's counsel is this in 1 Timothy 5 verse 14.
-
Therefore, I desire that the younger widows marry,
-
bear children, manage the house, give no opportunity
-
to the adversary to speak reproachfully. Whether
-
single or married, our calling, brothers and
-
sisters, is to holiness. It is to self -control.
-
It is to faithfulness in marriage. Actually,
-
faithfulness to God's design, whether single
-
or married. So let us then pursue purity. Let
-
us honor the marriage bed. Let us glorify God
-
with our bodies because our bodies are a temple
-
of the Holy Spirit who is in you and you are
-
not your own. Let's pray.